VARANASI: The fast-track courtroom of civil choose (senior division) Mahendra Kumar Pandey on Tuesday mounted March 1 as the subsequent date of listening to in a go well with filed by environmentalist Prabhu Narain in search of common worship of Lord Aadi Visheshwar and different deities in Gyanvapi compound and different reliefs.
The Anjuman Intezamia Masajid (AIM) has moved an adjournment demanding submitting a reply in opposition to the objection of the plaintiff within the go well with. “Being attentive to the adjournment moved by AIM, the FTC mounted March 1 as the subsequent date for listening to the go well with filed by Prabhu Narain,” stated further district authorities counsel (civil) Sulabh Prakash.
Prakash stated that AIM — the Gyanvapi mosque administration committee — had sought proof in assist of the claims made within the go well with. On January 17 the plaintiff filed an objection in opposition to AIM’s demand.
Narain’s advocate Anupam Dwivedi stated, “ Within the objection filed in opposition to the AIM’s demand, it was talked about that the proof in assist of the info was taken from Rigveda, Vedant, Aurangzeb Farman, Masir-e-Alamgir, historical past of Benaras. These info will not be personal however can be found in books and public area.”
Narain had filed a go well with to hunt common worship of Lord Aadi Visheshwar, Shringar Gauri, Lord Ganesh, Lord Hanuman and different deities in Gyanvapi compound, removing of higher development erected illegally over the temple and restoration of the heritage of the temple.
The Anjuman Intezamia Masajid (AIM) has moved an adjournment demanding submitting a reply in opposition to the objection of the plaintiff within the go well with. “Being attentive to the adjournment moved by AIM, the FTC mounted March 1 as the subsequent date for listening to the go well with filed by Prabhu Narain,” stated further district authorities counsel (civil) Sulabh Prakash.
Prakash stated that AIM — the Gyanvapi mosque administration committee — had sought proof in assist of the claims made within the go well with. On January 17 the plaintiff filed an objection in opposition to AIM’s demand.
Narain’s advocate Anupam Dwivedi stated, “ Within the objection filed in opposition to the AIM’s demand, it was talked about that the proof in assist of the info was taken from Rigveda, Vedant, Aurangzeb Farman, Masir-e-Alamgir, historical past of Benaras. These info will not be personal however can be found in books and public area.”
Narain had filed a go well with to hunt common worship of Lord Aadi Visheshwar, Shringar Gauri, Lord Ganesh, Lord Hanuman and different deities in Gyanvapi compound, removing of higher development erected illegally over the temple and restoration of the heritage of the temple.
(*1*)
Supply hyperlink