PRAYAGRAJ: Whereas observing that Mukhtar Ansari gang is the most dreaded prison gang of India, the Allahabad high court has rejected the bail software of one Ramu Mallah, a member of Mukhtar gang, in a homicide case of Mau district. The court additionally urged the state to offer sufficient safety of witnesses, as no truthful trial is feasible with out their disposition.
Within the current case in which the accused applicant had sought bail, mafia-turned-politician and former MLA Mukhtar Ansari and others are additionally accused.
Rejecting the bail software of Ramu Mallah, Justice Dinesh Kumar Singh declined to provide him good thing about parity in a case the place he was acquitted as witnesses turned hostile. “Merely because the accused has been acquitted because the witnesses have turned hostile in a number of the circumstances, his prison historical past doesn’t evaporate. Such a prison, if allowed to return out of jail, will surely be in a place to affect the witnesses and free, truthful and truthful deposition of the witnesses can be unimaginable. Subsequently, I discover no substance in the submission of the counsel for the accused applicant that because the accused applicant has secured acquittal, he must be enlarged on bail.”
Emphasizing the necessity for defense of witnesses, the court in its order dated March 1 additional mentioned, “Free and truthful trial and preservation of rule of legislation is just not potential, if the state doesn’t give witnesses safety and help for his or her free, frank and fearless deposition.”
Rejecting pleas of applicant’s counsel, the court in its March 1 order added, “The accused applicant is a dreaded prison and member of the most dreaded prison gang of India i.e. gang of Mukhtar Ansari. The accused applicant is dealing with a number of prison circumstances of heinous offences.”
Within the current case in which the accused applicant had sought bail, mafia-turned-politician and former MLA Mukhtar Ansari and others are additionally accused.
Rejecting the bail software of Ramu Mallah, Justice Dinesh Kumar Singh declined to provide him good thing about parity in a case the place he was acquitted as witnesses turned hostile. “Merely because the accused has been acquitted because the witnesses have turned hostile in a number of the circumstances, his prison historical past doesn’t evaporate. Such a prison, if allowed to return out of jail, will surely be in a place to affect the witnesses and free, truthful and truthful deposition of the witnesses can be unimaginable. Subsequently, I discover no substance in the submission of the counsel for the accused applicant that because the accused applicant has secured acquittal, he must be enlarged on bail.”
Emphasizing the necessity for defense of witnesses, the court in its order dated March 1 additional mentioned, “Free and truthful trial and preservation of rule of legislation is just not potential, if the state doesn’t give witnesses safety and help for his or her free, frank and fearless deposition.”
Rejecting pleas of applicant’s counsel, the court in its March 1 order added, “The accused applicant is a dreaded prison and member of the most dreaded prison gang of India i.e. gang of Mukhtar Ansari. The accused applicant is dealing with a number of prison circumstances of heinous offences.”